K.RAMESH

• Feb 21st, 2006

 

As per my knowledge J2EE is more features for security than DOTNET.

sandeep

• Mar 1st, 2006

 

hai to  every one

  As per majority programmers .NET is the  best one whch have single vendor compare to ,the eace of use,more use friendly,u can send any problem ,it'll be solved.

rul.sandeep

 Profile Answers by rul.sandeep Questions by rul.sandeep

• Mar 20th, 2006

 

with resp to j2ee is more secured

jeevan gholap Mcp(70-316),C-DAC

• May 30th, 2006

 

I Done C-DAC so i know both langg,

        J2EE is more secuered than .net, it is a platform independent,having some security .

Ashwin Shashikant Desai

• May 31st, 2006

 

Traditionally J2EE is the answer but practically if u take a look the .Net is not a platform independent, that is it always required a windows layer thus it is dependent on windows. Thus it is more secured than that of the J2EE. J2EE is safe on pointer point of view, as java has no pointer concept the hardware can not be accessed.

satyambabu53

 Profile 

• Jul 3rd, 2006

 

compare to dot net java j2ee is the more secure.

rajiv

• Aug 10th, 2006

 

.net is more secure than j2ee

Karthikeyan G

• Aug 24th, 2006

 

It highly depends on how you code.

Using Secured Software Development Life Cycle, we can produce secure code in both J2EE and Java

fresher

• Sep 26th, 2006

 

An application can be made secure by avoiding any loophole while designing and developoing the application.

As for java and dot net....there are people who can directly open any binary file in note pad to decode it.